Business Community Warns Appropriations Rider Would Wreak Havoc on Census Data and U.S. Economy - Articles

Articles

02Aug

Business Community Warns Appropriations Rider Would Wreak Havoc on Census Data and U.S. Economy

Fifteen business groups warned U.S. House leaders of the dangers from a provision in federal funding legislation that would “would crater response rates to all Census Bureau surveys and result in the decennial census and the American Community Survey (ACS) counting barely a third of the country,” while having “negative ripple effects across the U.S. economy.”

The August 2 letter to House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) and Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), led by the Insights Association, the leading nonprofit association representing the market research and analytics industry, was joined by the American Advertising Federation (AAF), American Association of Advertising Agencies (AAAA), American Planning Association, Associated General Contractors of America (AGC), Association of National Advertisers (ANA), Coin Laundry Association, ICSC, Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB), Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce, National Association of Business Economics (NABE), National Association of Home Builders (NAHB), National Association of REALTORS®, National Multifamily Housing Council (NMHC), and Nielsen.

Section 621 of the Fiscal Year 2025 (FY25) Commerce, Justice, Science (CJS) Appropriations bill, which passed the House Appropriations Committee on July 9, 2024, states: “None of the funds in this Act may be used to enforce involuntary compliance, or to inquire more than twice for voluntary compliance with any survey conducted by the Bureau of the Census.” The CJS bill did not get a vote on the House floor before August recess, but may be considered in September.

The business community letter noted that Section 621 “would (1) prohibit enforcement of the mandatory response requirement on the decennial headcount and the American Community Survey (ACS), and (2) severely constrict the ability to conduct basic contact and non-response follow-up operations across all Census Bureau surveys.”

It would also “would have an especially devastating impact on the decennial census, which must send way more than just two invitations to just secure self-response. According to data from the Census Quality Reinforcement Task Force, the 2020 Census had counted only 28% of U.S. households after the first two contacts, as of March 25, 2020, and no state had achieved even 35% coverage. This provision, by cutting off contacts after that point, including non-response follow up operations, would leave as much as two-thirds of the U.S. uncounted in the 2030 Census.”

The provision “would likewise undermine coverage in the ACS and the Current Population Survey” and other major “business, economic, and demographic surveys that have multiple follow-up contact strategies… These caps on contacts with households, businesses, retail purchasers, wholesalers, manufacturers and others will have serious consequences on the reliability and accuracy of the many economic indicators produced by the Census Bureau, which move markets in the U.S. and around the world.”

The letter encouraged Congress to “promote opportunities to secure reliable data by increasing response rates, not decreasing them,” giving “American businesses the certainty to plan, attract, and execute future investments. With Section 621 limiting response rates, every other survey in the U.S. built on the population totals from the decennial count and estimates from the ACS will produce inaccurate data and insights. Businesses use census data to promote economic development, identify potential customers, understand audiences and create jobs. The scenario under Section 621 would be disastrous for American business decision-makers and hinder economic competition, development, and growth.”

The business groups concluded by warning Congress that, “Section 621 would wreak havoc on Census Bureau surveys, and by extension on most every other survey and research study conducted across the country. Therefore, the undersigned members of the U.S. business community urge the removal of this provision as you advance the FY25 CJS Appropriations bill.”

About the Author

Howard Fienberg

Howard Fienberg

Based in Washington, DC, Howard is the Insights Association's lobbyist for the marketing research and data analytics industry, focusing primarily on consumer privacy and data security, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), tort reform, and the funding and integrity of the decennial Census and the American Community Survey (ACS). Howard has more than two decades of public policy experience. Before the Insights Association, he worked in Congress as senior legislative staffer for then-Representatives Christopher Cox (CA-48) and Cliff Stearns (FL-06). He also served more than four years with a science policy think tank, working to improve the understanding of scientific and social research and methodology among journalists and policymakers. Howard is also co-director of The Census Project, a 900+ member coalition in support of a fair and accurate Census and ACS. He has also served previously on the Board of Directors for the National Institute for Lobbying and Ethics and and the Association of Government Relations Professionals. Howard has an MA International Relations from the University of Essex in England and a BA Honors Political Studies from Trent University in Canada, and has obtained the Certified Association Executive (CAE), Professional Lobbying Certificate (PLC) and the Public Policy Certificate (PPC). When not running advocacy for the Insights Association, Howard enjoys hockey, NFL football, sci-fi and horror movies, playing with his dog, and spending time with family and friends.

Attachments

Related

New U.S. Law Gives Financial Boost to Continuing Education for Insights Professionals

New U.S. Law Gives Financial Boost to Continuing Education for Insights Professionals

The big tax and budget reconciliation law, signed by President Trump on July 4, 2025, includes a pro...

Read More >
Fighting for You: June 2025 Legislative and Regulatory Update

Fighting for You: June 2025 Legislative and Regulatory Update

June brought lots of sizzling policy developments for the insights industry -- some promising, other...

Read More >
Florida Kills Proposal That Would Have Prohibited Election Polling by State Universities

Florida Kills Proposal That Would Have Prohibited Election Polling by State Universities

The Florida legislature turned its back on a bill opposed by the Insights Association that would hav...

Read More >
New Approaches Proposed for Indirect Costs in Federally-Funded Research

New Approaches Proposed for Indirect Costs in Federally-Funded Research

Early in the second Trump Administration, the federal government instituted a uniform 15 percent cap...

Read More >
CFPB Withdraws Data Broker Rules That Could Have Clobbered Insights Work

CFPB Withdraws Data Broker Rules That Could Have Clobbered Insights Work

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) withdrew a regulatory proposal that could have unfai...

Read More >
Fighting for You: May 2025 Legislative and Regulatory Update

Fighting for You: May 2025 Legislative and Regulatory Update

Legislative and regulatory issues facing the insights industry are blooming all over, including: a n...

Read More >
Members only Article - Please login to view